38 Comments

On Trump and Musk, curious to see how Trump milks some more of Muskโ€™s wealth, or how long it takes for this bromance to fade if more is said that Musk is the most powerful person in the world. Trump will not tolerate a bigger Kahuna than him getting all the attention and perceived โ€œpower.โ€

Expand full comment

So the elitists did win. Good to know that the richest men in the world like Musk, Thiel, and Bezos played a key role in subverting our democracy. We are screwed.

Expand full comment

Kamala had over a billion- BILLION dollars

Expand full comment

How thick a bundle of cash did Elon Musk fork over to his Master/Puppet [your choice] Donald Trump?

Go figure.

Expand full comment

Chris, please move on from the election (who, what, etc.), itโ€™s over. Iโ€™d appreciate your thoughts on the Trump agenda, for starters, GOP Presidents have campaigned on eliminating the Department of Education since Carter made it a Cabinet post. Reagan and Bush (W) both campaigned on it, then wound up keeping it. It would help your readers to know what the Dept of Education does, why the GOP wanted to get rid of it, why they didnโ€™t, and pros and cons of doing so. Time to start talking issues, the campaign and election are over. Even if not your gig, you do a good job of pointing us in the right direction if you are familiar with others who have taken on this issue. Thanks!

Expand full comment

The Department of Education is close to useless. Go to WhiteChalkCrime.com. Trump will substitute his henchmen for the bullies now in command. The only change will be more privatization and vouchers. Our schoolsโ€™ failure to produce citizens is why Trump rose to power. Do not waste your thoughts on education unless youโ€™re willing to investigate what Iโ€™ve tried to blow the whistle on since 1995. Only that would make a difference. Trump wonโ€™t make it worse. Itโ€™s already a loyalty based mafia-system with a self serving agenda. And furthermore, no reporter looked into this. Theyโ€™ve looked the other way along with the unions, the courts, and the ACLU. If you care about education you must listen to the courageous whistleblower teachers on the podcast at WhiteChalkCrime.com, not the reporters who never looked into this, which one day will be known as their biggest failure.

Expand full comment

One thing the Ed Dept does is mandate that boys be allowed into any girls' space (including changing rooms, showers) at every school in the country.

As a college professor for 40 years, and a registered Democrat for 50, IMO the Ed Dept is completely useless and counterproductive, even aside from their insane policy on bodily privacy and dignity for children. I'd love to see Trump dismantle it.

Expand full comment

Interesting. Not familiar of the Dept of Ed mandate about allowing boys into girlsโ€™ spaces (and I assume then girls into boy spaces). If you can point me to it, would greatly appreciate itโ€ฆ.

Expand full comment

I agree. Check out WhiteChalkCrime.com. Our schools are so corrupt they need the smoke and mirrors if controversial issues so people focus on bad policies rather than their crime.

Expand full comment

It seems like a contest to see who's the bigger narcissist, megalomaniac, and richboy hoodlum.

Expand full comment

The more I think of Trump calling on Musk and Kennedy the more I have trouble sleeping at night.

Hopefully, like past relationships Trump has had, these will fizzle out.

I certainly hope so.

Expand full comment
Nov 12ยทedited Nov 12

We should all be taking bets on how long the Trump/Musk ego dance will last. Trump always has to be the smartest person in the room (even, of course, when he's not) -- and Trump turns on everyone in his circle eventually. I think it will crash before the inauguration.

Expand full comment

I give the romance till May Day.

Expand full comment

Musk is a bewitching seductress who Trump is infatuated with. Musk has the wealth, status, and chutzpah that Trump wishes he had. Musk is aware of the situation and is taking full advantage of it. We can only hope that Musks intentions are greed-related and not rooted in evil.

Expand full comment

Seems like Musk is taking Jared Kushnerโ€™s place as Trumpโ€™s apprentice (pun intended!) now that Jared and Ivanka barely acknowledge Daddyโ€™s existence

Expand full comment

Musk wants to be a sort of shadow president or co-president or unofficial prime minister, and Trump is humoring him but will never really share power until the dementia sets in quite a bit further. But what will Musk do Trump inevitably disappoints him?

Expand full comment

So Elon is the replacement for Ivanka and Jared? This seems bad, really bad.

Expand full comment

Well this just keeps getting better and better. And more and more terrifying. ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ

Expand full comment

I must point out that Twitter was FAR WORSE in terms of censorship before Musk bought it: any statement that did not adhere to trans ideology was cause for an immediate and permanent ban. Pre-Musk, many left-wing Democrat feminists such as Kara Dansky were banned from Twitter for their adherence to biological facts and women's sex-based rights.

And, according to a Democrat-aligned PAC doing post-election surveys of thousands of voters, TRANS WAS THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE FOR SWING VOTERS, AND #3 FOR ALL VOTERS (behind inflation and illegal immigration). Abortion was #22/21.

https://blueprint2024.com/polling/why-trump-reasons-11-8/

But before Musk bought Twitter, we were not allowed to talk about it on that platform. That's one reason why its importance will come as a shock to the Democrats who are so deeply ensconced in their blue bubbles.

Expand full comment

Dude, transgender is not an ideology. There have been transgender people since time began.

Expand full comment

Why was the electorate obsessed with the fate of 0.5% of the population? The anti-trans ads from the GOP were ubiquitous in the days leading up to the election. Given the results, I can't deny that they were effective but it just seems bizarre.

Expand full comment

Because it's not 0.5% of the population. For example, EVERY girl in EVERY school in the country must now deal with boys in her shower and changing rooms, thanks to the April 2024 ruling of the Biden-Harris Ed Dept that re-interpreted Title IX as forbidding discrimination against a self-determined "gender identity". If a boy says he is now a girl, then he is one, according to this ruling, and must be granted access to all girls' single-sex spaces. And he can change his mind about what his "gender identity" is as often as he likes. If he just likes to ogle naked girls, that's totally cool according to this ruling, there is nothing the school can do about it. And if the school tries to do something, all of its federal funding will be pulled.

Also, thousands of girls and women have already lost sports prizes to boys and men, here is a highly incomplete list (it lists over 1000 and has not been updated in some time, and was incomplete to begin with): https://www.shewon.org

Also, Democrats in blue states have unanimously passed laws greatly weakening parental rights to prevent their kids from running away from home and getting sex-trait modification drugs and surgeries. Walz proudly signed Minnesota's "trans state sanctuary law" to this effect. Also laws preventing parents from knowing that their kids have socially changed gender at school. The Democrat Attorneys General of New Jersey and California were suing school districts in their states for informing parents of what was happening to their kids, claiming this violated the child's privacy. This was a dicey interpretation of existing California law, so the Democrats in the state legislature unanimously passed a new law making it explicit that parents cannot be told.

So it's not bizarre at all that this was an important issue. It is the reason that I, a registered Democrat for 50 years and formerly a left-wing activist who worked as a volunteer on multiple Democrat campaigns at all levels, voted straight Republican.

Expand full comment

President ... Trusk

Expand full comment

Lichtman wrong

Chuck Todd wrong

Dutch called it right!

EZ election to call! How did these experts miss it so badly?!?

Expand full comment

On Lichtman, one of his keys was incumbency. He gave that key to Harris. Obviously, his model did not fit for the Harris use case. He also gave the good economy key to the incumbent. In many ways his model worked but he was so blinded in application

Expand full comment

I agree. He needs to changed his key to fit the model of a candidate who wins primary elections. Harris had 100 days for people to know her, and it wasn't enough time. Also inflation needs to be included somewhere in his keys, as the cost of eggs really did bother a bunch of voters.

Expand full comment

Economy was a โ€œkeyโ€ but it was given to Harris

Expand full comment

I know, because there is no recession (despite what Fox News says). But if inflation were included in one of the keys, it might have gone against Harris. But what do I know?

Expand full comment

Congratulations Dutch.

Expand full comment

Agree with Thune, boring but trained by McConnell how to work the system. And while I am sure the โ€œcountryโ€ was thinking of the Senate majority leader, as the vote for leader is traditionally non-public, I would bet there are enough Senators who inwardly are afraid of the Trump agenda even if they would never say it publicly.

Expand full comment

On Musk and X, hopeful some enterprising someone can either develop or market a new โ€œde facto town square for politics and political journalism.โ€

Expand full comment