My numbers were from the poll. I was not describing the actual demographics. So the PA participants in the poll broke 65/35. As I’ve said before the poll participants will almost never match the actual geographic distribution. That’s why they use weights to adjust the numbers. You again are misinterpreting the results. You are correct th…
My numbers were from the poll. I was not describing the actual demographics. So the PA participants in the poll broke 65/35. As I’ve said before the poll participants will almost never match the actual geographic distribution. That’s why they use weights to adjust the numbers. You again are misinterpreting the results. You are correct that the rural population was over represented but you are not correct in saying the results are biased because the weights will offset the over representation. It’s basic polling statistical methodology.
My numbers were from the poll. I was not describing the actual demographics. So the PA participants in the poll broke 65/35. As I’ve said before the poll participants will almost never match the actual geographic distribution. That’s why they use weights to adjust the numbers. You again are misinterpreting the results. You are correct that the rural population was over represented but you are not correct in saying the results are biased because the weights will offset the over representation. It’s basic polling statistical methodology.